5 Simple Techniques For case law on gift in cash
5 Simple Techniques For case law on gift in cash
Blog Article
Need to grasp the price of the espresso beater in Pakistan? Below’s the info: coffee beater price in pakistan.
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, Additionally it is a effectively-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is matter for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.
116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the moment case, the guidelines as established forth would not implement, as being the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, fairly he is acquitted of your criminal charges based on evidence and it really is well-settled legislation that once the civil servant is acquitted inside the criminal case, then on this extremely charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment by the department and held him disqualified to the post because acquittal for all long term purposes. The aforesaid proposition has been established at naught because of the Supreme Court of Pakistan while in the case with the District Police Officer Mainwali and a couple of others v.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are not binding, but could possibly be read more used as persuasive authority, which is to offer substance for the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
Power to levy tax and to legislate on immovable property like tax on annual rental value of immovable property after 18th Amendment(CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973)
The Court thought of the case to be maintainable under Article 184 (three) since the Hazard and encroachment alleged were including to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.
This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based around the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more
acquitted the appellants from many of the charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. (Criminal Revision )
Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and balance. It demonstrates the commitment of the state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of regulation.
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling around the same style of case.
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement on the laws, the legal system adheres to the doctrine of stare decisis
a hundred and fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance with the respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account with the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 on the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does provide for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. These contain if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension may be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set by the government.